Element 1: Standards, Policies, and Procedures
What to Measure |
How to Measure |
Comments | |
---|---|---|---|
Access | |||
1.1 |
Accessibility |
| |
1.2 |
Actual Access |
Audit how many actual "hits" on policies and procedures | |
1.3 |
Accessible language for code, standards and policies |
Flesch Kincaid measuring standard – no more than 10th grade reading level | |
1.4 |
Compliance program awareness and communication |
| |
1.5 |
Impaired or disabled accessibility |
Review accessibility options. Look at methods and speak to individuals. | |
1.6 |
Policy communication |
Communication strategy of policies | |
1.7 |
Availability of policy content |
Conduct surveys and observation | |
Accountability | |||
1.8 |
Accountability |
Policy Coordinator designated | |
1.9 |
Ownership and accountability of policies |
Audit process of how policies get enforced by chain of command when compliance is not the final approver. Is management taking responsibility for implementing and following policies? | |
1.10 |
Routine policies and procedures |
Confirm that listed owner of each policy and procedure is the actual owner. | |
Review/Approval Process | |||
1.11 |
Annual review and Board approval of Compliance Plan |
Audit: Review of Board minutes | |
1.12 |
Compliance documentation operations manual |
Compliance or other oversight committee to review annually to ensure it is up to date. | |
1.13 |
Maintenance of policies |
Check last review or revision | |
1.14 |
Number of policies reviewed and is the review timely |
Process review/audit. Use checklist to ensure all basic policy elements are in place, updated consistently and reviewed/approved by appropriate parties. | |
1.15 |
Policy approvals |
Checklist audit. Create list of policies, review committee and board minutes to ensure all approvals have been obtained. | |
1.16 |
Policy review process |
Audit process by which policies and procedures are prepared, approved, disseminated, etc. | |
1.17 |
Process for ensuring full organizational participation in policy and procedure development |
Review documentation/minutes to verify input considered and solicited for policy and procedure development and review | |
1.18 |
Process for review and approving |
Check for written process | |
Quality | |||
1.19 |
Are policies (and procedures) as good as industry practice |
Peer reviews | |
1.20 |
Integrity of Process for developing and implementing policies and procedures |
Audit policy and procedure on policy and procedures | |
1.21 |
Language and reading level of policies |
Are policies written in plain language, appropriate grade reading level and written in applicable languages for organization? Policy review, Word grade level review and interviews of staff to make sure they understand. | |
1.22 |
Language translation |
Audit or process review. Are policies and the code of conduct translated into appropriate languages for organization? | |
1.23 |
Usefulness |
SURVEY ‐ Do department policies and procedures assist you in doing your job effectively? (Yes/No/Don't know) | |
1.24 |
Need for policies that don’t exist |
Interview staff to determine if they need the certain policies to strengthen internal controls. | |
1.25 |
Policies and procedures |
Request review from external experts | |
Assessment | |||
1.26 |
Assessment of all company policies |
Check list of policies; which are compliance and which are business | |
1.27 |
Essential compliance policies and procedures exist |
Can staff actually articulate policies and procedures; test staff | |
1.28 |
Existence of procedure to support policy |
Audit for procedure to support policy | |
1.29 |
Fundamental policies and procedures in place |
Have focus groups of work units/departments to determine whether they understand the policies and procedures necessary to do their jobs. | |
1.30 |
Identifiability |
| |
1.31 |
List of policies are applicable to employees |
Supervisors to assess direct staff | |
1.32 |
Are those affected by policy given the opportunity to weigh in on policy when developed? |
Focus groups and interviews of those affected by policy. | |
1.33 |
List of required policies |
Create checklist to make sure minimum policies are in place and then audit against the list. | |
1.34 |
Effectiveness of policies |
Effectiveness of policies based on the submission hotline calls | |
1.35 |
Policies and procedures that have been identified as part of corrective action |
Process review. Conduct annual meeting with compliance and legal to look at databases and control and prioritize review to ensure implementation and ongoing compliance with policies and procedures. | |
1.36 |
Policies for high risk and operational areas |
Audit | |
1.37 |
Policies, standards and procedures are based on assessed risks |
Risk assessment, policy exists for each risk identified in the risk assessment (coverage of a specific risk topic) | |
1.38 |
Policy inventory to ensure no overlap and contradiction of policies |
Create inventory and analyze inventory. Analyze and review past efforts. Look at various departments that might have overlapping policies. | |
1.39 |
Policy review following investigation/issue |
Top policies implicated in an investigation are reviewed to determine if policy ambiguous, complex, fails to adequately safeguard issues. Validate through audit. | |
1.40 |
Routine policies and procedures are addressed and filter down. |
Review department and committee agendas to ensure policies are addressed | |
Code of Conduct | |||
1.41 |
Code of Conduct |
Audit: Review dates, board approvals, distribution processes, attestations, survey employees for understanding, conduct focus groups. | |
1.42 |
Compliance program awareness and communication |
Survey employees to determine the extent to which they know the content of the Standards of Conduct (SOC) and how to access it. | |
1.43 |
Integrate mission, vision, values, and ethical principles with code of conduct |
Compare code with mission and vision statements to see if it includes elements/statements. Check to see if code is accessible to employees | |
1.44 |
Maintenance of code of conduct |
Is code written, posted for employees, documented frequency of reviews, and survey/test employees on ability to locate it | |
1.45 |
Distribution |
Documentation of Code of Conduct distribution tracking and results over past two years for all employees, employed physicians, allied health professionals, independent (contracted) physicians, volunteers and vendors/contractor/consultants in the organization | |
1.46 |
Orientation |
Audit to ensure all employees receive orientation to the SOC and compliance policies within 30 days of hire. | |
1.47 |
Staff understanding of code of conduct and policies and procedures |
| |
Updates | |||
1.48 |
Compliance program communication of rule changes |
Review periodically and at rule changes – Audit to ensure there is adequate communication to employees, including changes in policy/procedure. | |
1.49 |
New and updated policy distribution and education of appropriate staff |
Process review ‐ Does organization have formal process to make workforce aware of new policies or changes in policies? | |
1.50 |
Practices implemented after new policy |
Audit practices and review committee minutes and other documentation to determine how new policies are implemented. | |
Understanding | |||
1.51 |
Understanding of Policies/Procedures |
| |
1.52 |
Orientation |
Ensure employees are provided instruction by knowledgeable personnel for questions/clarity | |
1.53 |
Policies reflect practice |
Use policies as audit tool and then interview, observe and conduct document review to ensure policies are being followed. | |
1.54 |
Questions asked by employees |
System in place to track employee questions and concerns to ensure consistent guidance. Track departments where questions come from to deploy additional education where necessary. | |
1.55 |
Understandable to board and c‐suite |
Test board and c‐suite on location and understanding | |
1.56 |
Understandable to employees |
| |
Compliance Plan | |||
1.57 |
Maintain compliance plan and program |
Review written plan or written schedule of compliance activities | |
1.58 |
Maintain compliance department operations manual |
| |
Confidentiality Statements | |||
1.59 |
Verify maintenance of appropriate confidentiality policies |
| |
Enforcement | |||
1.60 |
Compliance with policies |
Conduct interviews, observation. | |
1.61 |
Policy violations |
Audit policy and procedures to make sure practice consistent with policy. | |
1.62 |
Adherence to policies and procedures for cases involving patient harm and reporting to regulatory agency |
Review policies and procedures and cases involving patient harm and validate proper reporting to regulatory agency |
Element 2: Compliance Program Administration
What to Measure |
How to Measure |
Comments | |
---|---|---|---|
Board of Directors | |||
2.1 |
Active Board of Directors |
| |
2.2 |
Board understanding and oversight of their responsibilities |
| |
2.3 |
Appropriate escalation to oversight body |
| |
2.4 |
Commitment from top |
| |
2.5 |
Process for escalation and accountability |
Process review (document review, interviews, etc.). Is there timely reporting and resolution of matters? | |
Compliance Budget | |||
2.6 |
Appropriate oversight of budget |
Review charter of governing body (Board) to verify it includes approval of compliance budget | |
2.7 |
Budget is based on an assessment of risk and program improvement/effectiveness |
Is the Board’s approval of the budget based on identified risks and effectiveness evaluation/program improvement? | |
2.8 |
Sufficient compliance program resources (budget, staffing) |
Review budget and staffing to ensure significant risks are managed appropriately | |
Compliance Committees | |||
2.9 |
Active involvement of compliance committee members |
Track percentage of attendance of each compliance committee member over the last year | |
2.10 |
Assure that the compliance oversight committee goals and functions are outlined |
Review charter of committee | |
2.11 |
Committee structure |
Review documentation of structure of committees as well as charters. Ensure no conflicting charters. | |
2.12 |
Compliance committee composition and attendance |
Review charter and minutes to assure attendance. | |
2.13 |
Cascade administration of compliance program throughout the organization |
Different operational areas give some certification/disclosure to the compliance office | |
2.14 |
Composition of Compliance Committee |
Review organizational chart to validate correct composition | |
2.15 |
Effectiveness of compliance committee meetings |
Keep executive report card by member qualitative/quantitative with indicators of contribution on topics | |
2.16 |
Engagement |
In the last two years, have the compliance committee meetings been held in accordance with the charter? | |
2.17 |
Engagement of Directors/Managers |
Review committee structure to evaluate how directors/managers are participating in Compliance Operational Committee(s) meeting includes agenda, minutes, attendance and reports from subcommittees | |
2.18 |
Executive Leadership engaged in Compliance Program |
Review frequency of meetings, membership, attendance, agenda and minutes over the past year of the Compliance Executive Committee to include all members of the Senior Executive team receiving information directly from the Compliance Officer | |
Accountability | |||
2.19 |
Leadership accountability |
Audit documentation and conduct interviews. Some examples might include:
| |
2.20 |
Management accountability for compliance |
Process and document review and interviews.
| |
Compliance Officer | |||
2.21 |
Competency |
| |
2.22 |
Is the compliance officer a key stakeholder in the strategic initiatives of the organization |
| |
2.23 |
Compliance department involvement in enterprise‐wide initiatives/entities/strategies (e.g., involvement or penetration in joint venture initiatives and other organizational inventory) |
| |
2.24 |
Compliance independence/compliance structure |
| |
2.25 |
Compliance integration |
Audit to determine the extent to which compliance officer is involved in training, policy development, marketing and other operational aspects of the business | |
2.26 |
Compliance Officer reporting structure and oversight to ensure direct access to C suite and board |
| |
2.27 |
Compliance officer’s independence/objectivity |
| |
2.28 |
Credibility of compliance officer |
Job Description review, ongoing training of compliance officer, basic competencies, certifications, reporting structure | |
2.29 |
How much authority does the compliance officer have to start a working group to look at changes? |
| |
2.30 |
How supported the compliance officer feels |
| |
2.31 |
Organizational perception of compliance officer and corporate compliance program |
Survey employees regarding:
| |
2.32 |
Compliance problem solving and adequacy of process |
Process review | |
Staffing | |||
2.33 |
Adequacy of staffing and resources |
| |
2.34 |
Assurance of staffing |
Review qualifications of staff; ratio of compliance staff to business, compensation to the business | |
2.35 |
Adequacy of compliance staff based on risk assessment |
Risk assessment considers the number and competency of staff required to address risk | |
Compliance Plan | |||
2.36 |
Compliance plan assessments |
| |
2.37 |
Compliance plan process |
Audit process for development of the annual compliance plan. | |
2.38 |
Compliance organization |
Assess the positioning and effectiveness of the compliance organization staff, titles, organizational chart, pay, promotion records compared to other areas within the organization | |
2.39 |
Document that establishes the authority of the program |
Document review, meeting minutes for approval. | |
2.40 |
Perception of compliance program |
Survey employees | |
Culture | |||
2.41 |
Accountability |
SURVEY ‐ Does the compliance department have an impact on how you do your job? (Yes/No/Don't know) | |
2.42 |
Accuracy and Trust in Monitoring |
SURVEY: Do you believe the information from your department is reported with a high degree of integrity and accuracy? (Yes/ No/Don’t know) | |
2.43 |
Culture |
Conduct cultural survey (interviews, confidential surveys, focus groups, etc.) and report findings to compliance committee and board. Review minutes to ensure report out and action plan established. | |
2.44 |
Effectiveness of compliance program in the field |
Survey of field compliance people | |
2.45 |
What is company doing to drive compliance culture? |
Surveys.
| |
2.46 |
Employee comments from “Rounding” |
Audit the tracking of what employees report when proactively asked by compliance department (or leadership, etc.) and how this information is managed and reported. | |
2.47 |
Measuring effectiveness of executive communication on compliance |
Track on‐line engagement (clicks) and survey audience | |
Incentives | |||
2.48 |
Aligning performance management system (promotion system) with ethics and compliance objectives |
Audit criteria of promotion, bonuses and assignments | |
2.49 |
Compliance and Ethics Role/participation for developing the incentive system |
Have an outside independent expert audit the incentive system and compliance officer's participation | |
2.50 |
Is incentive system consistent with compliance program |
Employee Survey | |
Performance Evaluations | |||
2.51 |
Proper alignment of compliance objectives with organizational performance incentives (promotions/performance appraisals/bonuses) |
| |
2.52 |
“Compliance” as a performance appraisal element |
| |
2.53 |
Manager performance evaluations |
Managers have open door policy, communicate compliance directives/initiatives, address compliance matters and effectiveness is noted in performance evaluation. | |
2.54 |
Is compliance taken into account in promotion decisions? |
Review promotion lists and documentation to support promotion. Did the individual actively promote compliance? | |
2.55 |
Organizational Retaliation |
Track whistleblower promotion, bonuses, sick days, disciplinary, corrective action measures and exit interview over long term | |
Risk Assessments | |||
2.56 |
Compliance Resource knowledge and competence |
Survey, focus groups and interviews | |
2.57 |
Compliance staff knowledge of current regulatory changes and laws |
Document review and interviews. Review certificates of attendance at conferences/other educational events, “tools” used to keep compliance staff current, compliance budget (to support access to current regulatory changes and laws). | |
2.58 |
Monitoring of regulations that impact the organization |
Document and process review, interviews.
| |
2.59 |
Risk Assessment Cycle |
| |
2.60 |
Risk based work plan that covers compliance plan elements with board approval and regular reporting on those projects to board |
Compliance Committee and board minutes review. | |
2.61 |
Work plan development based on risk assessment |
Process and document review. | |
2.62 |
Prioritization of risk and consultation with applicable risk partners (i.e., legal, HR, IT, risk management, etc.) |
Documentation and process review. Is there a risk based plan? How was it developed? | |
2.63 |
Exit interview |
Compliance concerns that come up in exit interviews are addressed | |
Compliance Work Plan | |||
2.64 |
Compliance work plan |
Audit to ensure the work plan is developed and implemented and it is followed‐through and outcomes are reported to compliance committee or to governing body | |
2.65 |
Effectiveness of compliance program |
Written annual work plan that includes minutes | |
Legal Counsel's Role | |||
2.66 |
Role of counsel in compliance process |
Interview counsel regarding their involvement.
| |
2.67 |
Existence and adherence to policy on involvement of legal in handling matters under privilege |
Review policy and sample areas that were referred to legal followed the policy | |
Other | |||
2.68 |
Job descriptions of management |
Review of management job descriptions. Do managers have concrete compliance deliverables other than training and abiding by Code of Conduct? |