§ 141.23 Inorganic chemical sampling and analytical requirements.
Community water systems shall conduct monitoring to determine compliance with the maximum contaminant levels specified in § 141.62 in accordance with this section. Non-transient, non-community water systems shall conduct monitoring to determine compliance with the maximum contaminant levels specified in § 141.62 in accordance with this section. Transient, non-community water systems shall conduct monitoring to determine compliance with the nitrate and nitrite maximum contaminant levels in §§ 141.11 and 141.62 (as appropriate) in accordance with this section.
(a) Monitoring shall be conducted as follows:
(1) Groundwater systems shall take a minimum of one sample at every entry point to the distribution system which is representative of each well after treatment (hereafter called a sampling point) beginning in the initial compliance period. The system shall take each sample at the same sampling point unless conditions make another sampling point more representative of each source or treatment plant.
(2) Surface water systems shall take a minimum of one sample at every entry point to the distribution system after any application of treatment or in the distribution system at a point which is representative of each source after treatment (hereafter called a sampling point) beginning in the initial compliance period. The system shall take each sample at the same sampling point unless conditions make another sampling point more representative of each source or treatment plant.
Note:
For purposes of this paragraph, surface water systems include systems with a combination of surface and ground sources.
(3) If a system draws water from more than one source and the sources are combined before distribution, the system must sample at an entry point to the distribution system during periods of normal operating conditions (i.e., when water is representative of all sources being used).
(4) The State may reduce the total number of samples which must be analyzed by allowing the use of compositing. Composite samples from a maximum of five samples are allowed, provided that the detection limit of the method used for analysis is less than one-fifth of the MCL. Compositing of samples must be done in the laboratory.
(i) If the concentration in the composite sample is greater than or equal to one-fifth of the MCL of any inorganic chemical, then a follow-up sample must be taken within 14 days at each sampling point included in the composite. These samples must be analyzed for the contaminants which exceeded one-fifth of the MCL in the composite sample. Detection limits for each analytical method and MCLs for each inorganic contaminant are the following:
Detection Limits for Inorganic Contaminants
Contaminant | MCL (mg/l) | Methodology | Detection limit (mg/l) |
---|---|---|---|
Antimony | 0.006 | Atomic Absorption; Furnace | 0.003 |
Atomic Absorption; Platform | 0.0008 5 | ||
ICP-Mass Spectrometry | 0.0004 | ||
Hydride-Atomic Absorption | 0.001 | ||
Arsenic | 0.010 6 | Atomic Absorption; Furnace | 0.001 |
Atomic Absorption; Platform—Stabilized Temperature | 0.0005 7 | ||
Atomic Absorption; Gaseous Hydride | 0.001 | ||
ICP-Mass Spectrometry | 0.0014 8 | ||
Asbestos | 7 MFL 1 | Transmission Electron Microscopy | 0.01 MFL |
Barium | 2 | Atomic Absorption; furnace technique | 0.002 |
Atomic Absorption; direct aspiration | 0.1 | ||
Inductively Coupled Plasma | 0.002 (0.001) | ||
Beryllium | 0.004 | Atomic Absorption; Furnace | 0.0002 |
Atomic Absorption; Platform | 0.00002 5 | ||
Inductively Coupled Plasma 2 | 0.0003 | ||
ICP-Mass Spectrometry | 0.0003 | ||
Cadmium | 0.005 | Atomic Absorption; furnace technique | 0.0001 |
Inductively Coupled Plasma | 0.001 | ||
Chromium | 0.1 | Atomic Absorption; furnace technique | 0.001 |
Inductively Coupled Plasma | 0.007 (0.001) | ||
Cyanide | 0.2 | Distillation, Spectrophotometric 3 | 0.02 |
Distillation, Automated, Spectrophotometric 3 | 0.005 | ||
Distillation, Amenable, Spectrophotometric 4 | 0.02 | ||
Distillation, Selective Electrode 3 4 | 0.05 | ||
UV, Distillation, Spectrophotometric 9 | 0.0005 | ||
Micro Distillation, Flow Injection, Spectrophotometric 3 | 0.0006 | ||
Ligand Exchange with Amperometry 4 | 0.0005 | ||
Mercury | 0.002 | Manual Cold Vapor Technique | 0.0002 |
Automated Cold Vapor Technique | 0.0002 | ||
Nickel | xl | Atomic Absorption; Furnace | 0.001 |
Atomic Absorption; Platform | 0.0006 5 | ||
Inductively Coupled Plasma 2 | 0.005 | ||
ICP-Mass Spectrometry | 0.0005 | ||
Nitrate | 10 (as N) | Manual Cadmium Reduction | 0.01 |
Automated Hydrazine Reduction | 0.01 | ||
Automated Cadmium Reduction | 0.05 | ||
Ion Selective Electrode | 1 | ||
Ion Chromatography | 0.01 | ||
Capillary Ion Electrophoresis | 0.076 | ||
Nitrite | 1 (as N) | Spectrophotometric | 0.01 |
Automated Cadmium Reduction | 0.05 | ||
Manual Cadmium Reduction | 0.01 | ||
Ion Chromatography | 0.004 | ||
Capillary Ion Electrophoresis | 0.103 | ||
Selenium | 0.05 | Atomic Absorption; furnace | 0.002 |
Atomic Absorption; gaseous hydride | 0.002 | ||
Thallium | 0.002 | Atomic Absorption; Furnace | 0.001 |
Atomic Absorption; Platform | 0.0007 5 | ||
ICP-Mass Spectrometry | 0.0003 |
1 MFL = million fibers per liter >10 µm.
2 Using a 2X preconcentration step as noted in Method 200.7. Lower MDLs may be achieved when using a 4X preconcentration.
3 Screening method for total cyanides.
4 Measures “free” cyanides when distillation, digestion, or ligand exchange is omitted.
5 Lower MDLs are reported using stabilized temperature graphite furnace atomic absorption.
6 The value for arsenic is effective January 23, 2006. Unit then, the MCL is 0.05 mg/L.
7 The MDL reported for EPA method 200.9 (Atomic Absorption; Platform—Stablized Temperature) was determined using a 2x concentration step during sample digestion. The MDL determined for samples analyzed using direct analyses (i.e., no sample digestion) will be higher. Using multiple depositions, EPA 200.9 is capable of obtaining MDL of 0.0001 mg/L.
8 Using selective ion monitoring, EPA Method 200.8 (ICP-MS) is capable of obtaining a MDL of 0.0001 mg/L.
9 Measures total cyanides when UV-digestor is used, and “free” cyanides when UV-digestor is bypassed.
(ii) If the population served by the system is >3,300 persons, then compositing may only be permitted by the State at sampling points within a single system. In systems serving ≤3,300 persons, the State may permit compositing among different systems provided the 5-sample limit is maintained.
(iii) If duplicates of the original sample taken from each sampling point used in the composite sample are available, the system may use these instead of resampling. The duplicates must be analyzed and the results reported to the State within 14 days after completing analysis of the composite sample, provided the holding time of the sample is not exceeded.
(5) The frequency of monitoring for asbestos shall be in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section: the frequency of monitoring for antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cyanide, fluoride, mercury, nickel, selenium and thallium shall be in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section; the frequency of monitoring for nitrate shall be in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section; and the frequency of monitoring for nitrite shall be in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
(b) The frequency of monitoring conducted to determine compliance with the maximum contaminant level for asbestos specified in § 141.62(b) shall be conducted as follows:
(1) Each community and non-transient, non-community water system is required to monitor for asbestos during the first three-year compliance period of each nine-year compliance cycle beginning in the compliance period starting January 1, 1993.
(2) If the system believes it is not vulnerable to either asbestos contamination in its source water or due to corrosion of asbestos-cement pipe, or both, it may apply to the State for a waiver of the monitoring requirement in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. If the State grants the waiver, the system is not required to monitor.
(3) The State may grant a waiver based on a consideration of the following factors:
(i) Potential asbestos contamination of the water source, and
(ii) The use of asbestos-cement pipe for finished water distribution and the corrosive nature of the water.